 |
 |
Tale of Self Discovery Part 3
History of Alpha Brain Wave Feedback
Part 3 - continued from part 2
[Published in Megabrain Reports, May, 1994, edited for the web]
James V. Hardt, Ph.D.
The Biocybernaut Institute
Historically, the roots of Alpha brain wave feedback
training lie in a discovery made in 1908 by an Austrian Psychiatrist
named Hans Berger. He discovered the existence of oscillating
electrical waves in the brain, and he called them Alpha waves, because
they were the first electrical activity to be discovered in the brain.
Alpha [ ] is the first letter of the Greek alphabet, like our "a ", and is often
used to mean the first or the beginning. He kept his discovery secret for 10
years while he conducted research into what he thought was the basis of ESP.
Berger also discovered that Alpha waves were uncommon in
anxious people, and if an anxious person did have a few Alpha waves, they
were smaller than usual (a weaker signal with less amplitude). After he
published his findings in 1918, interest in electrical waves in the
brain spread rapidly around the world. Early scientists mapped out the
different types of brain waves (Alpha, Beta, Delta, and Theta), and
began to do psychophysical studies on the "natural reactivity " of these brain
waves to sensory stimulation. None of these early investigators (pre 1962)
ever imagined that people could learn voluntary control of their own brain
waves, which were thought to be exclusively an autonomic function.
The new science of Biofeedback was actually launched in
April of 1962 by a report by Dr. Joe Kamiya (my former teacher, then
colleague and co-author) that people could in fact learn voluntary
control of their own brain waves. Brain wave feedback training was
heralded primarily as promoting relaxation and mental creativity. Brain wave
studies of meditation established that meditators could exert profound
control over their brain waves, and brain wave feedback was thought to make
possible an "instant Zen " experience. Speculations became confused with
claims, and by the late 1960s a firestorm of media attention ensued. This
firestorm of popular attention to exaggerated or unsubstantiated claims
disturbed the conservative authorities of the medical, psychiatric, and
psychological communities.
As a result, a number of eminent scientists began to do
Alpha brain wave feedback studies to rebut the popularized claims. Many
of these eminent scientists were unfamiliar with the vast classical literature
of scientific research on brain waves and psychophysics, especially the work
done on the psychophysics of Alpha waves. As a result their studies did not
employ anything approaching optimal designs or ergonomic feedback
technology.
Without an informed understanding of the causes of the
natural waxing and waning of Alpha rhythms it proved to be quite difficult
to successfully train people to increase their Alpha, resulting in most
Alpha researchers in the 1970s failing to teach their research subjects how to
increase Alpha activity, obviously resulting in a flood of publications stating
that Alpha feedback did not work. Some of these reports even suggested that
people innately lacked the ability to learn control of their Alpha activity.
Most of these researchers did not know that their incomplete findings were
caused by non-ergonomic feedback technology and inappropriate training
protocols, and virtually all employed too little feedback time. Also absent
in these reports were any Alpha-related benefits. If benefits come with
increased Alpha, then no Alpha increase means no benefits.
Some in the cultural establishment may actually have been
relieved that Alpha feedback was being shown not to work, given the
difficulties which were experienced in countering the psychedelic drug movement
and movement known then as the "counter culture ". The popular belief that
Alpha feedback was an electronic technology for consciousness expansion and
transformation, was now contradicted by the existing consensus of so called
experts. So the word went out: "Brain waves can NOT be voluntarily
controlled. " As a result the Alpha brain wave feedback movement went
underground by the mid 1970s, and most brain wave training fell into
obscurity as just another fad spawned by the Psychedelic 1960s.
However, the considerable clinical and popular enthusiasm,
which had been generated for doing "biofeedback " could not be put back into the
bottle. That energy and enthusiasm was blocked from going into brain wave
research by the negative findings of experts, so all that energy went, instead,
into doing "biofeedback " with the NON-brain activity of the body. Biofeedback
became to be synonymous with the peripheral modalities of muscle tension
(learning to relax the muscles), of skin temperature (learning to warm the
hands and feet), and electrodermal (learning to change the electrical responses
of the skin which are induced by shallow or transient emotions).
Most of this "biofeedback " work was done under the label of
"stress reduction ", which was acceptable to established authorities. At the
same time the clinical practitioners of peripheral modality biofeedback were
gradually eroding resistance to the idea that the mind and body are
inextricably interconnected. There were also specialty applications which
began to infringe on the domains of medicine, dentistry, and psychiatry. For
example, learning to relax the jaw muscles would prevent teeth grinding and the
tooth loss associated with bruxism. In addition, learning to warm the fingers
and toes cured a painful disorder characterized by inadequate blood circulation
in the digits known as Reynoud's disease. Medicine had been ineffectively
treating Reynoud's disease with powerful drugs, which had negative side
effects, and as a last resort, by amputation of the fingers and toes.
Temperature biofeedback was a big improvement over traditional medicine in this
regard.
Although there will soon be major changes as people
rediscover the power and the range of brain wave feedback training, most of the
work done today by biofeedback clinicians is still done with the peripheral
modalities of skin temperature, muscle tension, and electrical conductivity (or
resistance) of the skin. Peripheral modalities of feedback are generally only
effective in working with some peripheral symptoms. The peripheral modalities
are largely ineffective in working centrally, with the brain itself. This
limits the results to treatment of symptoms rather than treating their
underlying causes.
Because would-be brain wave biofeedback practitioners have
been limited by grossly inadequate equipment, until just the last few years,
and because they continue to be limited by lack of knowledge of proper brain
wave training protocols, biofeedback has been limited to the peripheral
modalities. Biofeedback has remained, in the official view, as an interesting
curiosity of limited power and limited range of applications. As a result,
biofeedback has not been highly regarded by the medical professions.
Self discovery continues - Part 4
|
 |
|
|
 |